To the examine,
Here is the coursework for my A2 media where we created a music video for the Little Comets song One Night In October. All my posts are labelled Harry Tibbles and i hope you find my progress from the initial planning and research to my final products as interesting as it was to make.
Thanks for taking time to read / watch;
Harry Tibbles
Saturday, 24 December 2011
Final Note to the Examiner
Labels:
final post,
Goodbye,
Harry Tibbles,
Note to the examiner
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
Final note:
To the examiner,
I hope you enjoy seeing all of our progress from research and planning through to our final product and my final ancillary products.
All of my posts are tagged under 'Jess' in the labels, and my evaluation is under 'jess evaluation' in the labels also.
Thank you for reading/watching,
Jess Pardoe
I hope you enjoy seeing all of our progress from research and planning through to our final product and my final ancillary products.
All of my posts are tagged under 'Jess' in the labels, and my evaluation is under 'jess evaluation' in the labels also.
Thank you for reading/watching,
Jess Pardoe
(Meg, Harry, Jess, Joe)
For The Moderator
Hello,
Below you can find all of our coursework which is clearly labeled at the bottom of the page. We hope you enjoy our work and how our skills in making this work have developed.
Regards,
Meg, Jess, Harry & Joe
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
Evaluation Question 4
Evaluation Question 3
What Have You Learnt From Your Audience Feedback?
We decided to show our music video to a group of students with age ranges of 14-19 and spanning a wide range of music tastes. We then filmed some of the viewers on what they liked about the video. As an added extra we decided to conduct a fake chat show in which we had (from right to left) a industry professional (played by me), a fan of the band (Jess), a Little Comet themselves (Joe) and finally someone who was in the band (Will). We asked some of the same questions we asked the viewers and then answered them in the way we thought the people we were playing would answer them.
As a note i would like to add that the part in the video below where me Joe and Jess were going through the feedback questionnaires we handed was was supposed to also contain Meg but unfortunately she had an exam so was unable to be there with us to film that part.
Video Feedback:
Media Evaluation Qestion 3 by Harry_Tibbles
Evaluation Question 2
Evaluation Question 1
FINAL: Question 3. What have you learned from your audience feedback?
Click the image to be taken to the website
To gain more feedback, we showed our music video to Jess' form and supplied them with questionnaires so they could give us feedback on the video. They watched it once then filled out the questionnaire. After the showing of the film we then asked a few students, that watched it, individually what they liked about the video and what they would give it if they were to rate it. The majority of the feedback we got was positive saying they really liked it as well as thinking it fitted into the indie genre which we really wanted to achieve. There were some comments that we weren't expecting and some negative ones but this was expected because not everyone watching the video was in our target audience meaning it might not appeal to them.
FINAL: Question 4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Music Video
Digipak
Digipak
Sunday, 18 December 2011
Evaluation: Question 4
4. How did you use media technologies in the construction and research, planning and evaluation stages?
Labels:
evaluation,
Final,
Jess,
jess evaluation,
Question 4
Evaluation: Question 3
As a group we created this feedback video about our video as well;
We presented our video to my form group, with the age range of 14 to 19 and produced this video with some individual interviews of feedback.
Labels:
evaluation,
Final,
Jess,
jess evaluation,
Question 3
Evaluation: Question 2
Labels:
evaluation,
Final,
Jess,
jess evaluation,
Question 2
Saturday, 17 December 2011
Evaluation: Question 1
Labels:
evaluation,
Final,
Jess,
jess evaluation,
Question 1
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
Evaluation Question 1 - In What Ways Does Your Media Product Use, Develop Or Challenge Forms And Conventions Of Real Media Products?
Evaluation Question 2 - How Effective Is The Combination Of Your Main Product And Ancillary Texts?
The magazine article was inspired by this NME article
On the other hand, my digipac does not show my band together, which is a common convention used by other media products already on the market. My reasoning for this was to create a retro feel as it is typical of the indie genre and so to fit into this, I would have to use certain styles which would attract this kind of market group.
The use of artwork in my digipac and poster may be considered to be quite pretentious, however, I think that this is all part of the branding with my products as our video shows pretentious elements too, and so makes the link between my main product and ancillary texts actually quite effective.
What I mean by this is that my digipac has a closed narrative. Some people may look for artistic, deeper meanings within my product, however, it is all part of the disjuncture and there are no greater meanings. Our music video uses exactly the same idea; there are arty ideas, such as: the banana and monkey scene; the cocoa drinking in a boat on land etc. These ideas all have artistic features and may be considered quite pretentious as they use random, artistic locations and ideas without the intention to impose a narrative. There are no deeper meanings with these ideas, they’re created with a sole purpose to entertain a niche market (the indie genre), and this is what I think we have done well.
My digipac, poster and video do not show direct links between one another because this is not something I have seen often used in the indie genre. From the digipacs I have seen from the likes of Two Door Cinema Club, Arcade Fire and Vampire Weekend, they do not use the imagery featured in their music videos, however, it is conventional to show links between the digipac and video with other genres such as pop, R&B, Blues etc. As they may wear the same clothes or follow a certain theme as this is all part of their branding and how they are memorable to their audience – this is a form of advertising for the artist.
Evaluation Question 3 - What Have You Learnt From Your Audience Feedback?
Click To Enlarge Image
Video Feedback:
In conclusion to these feedbacks I have gained a lot of knowledge from audience feedback and I think it has helped me to develop my digipac, poster and video in order to make them more professional. I have learnt that sometimes what I think may look amazing, some people may not appreciate and when you are creating artwork you need imagery and iconography that appeals to a wider audience than just yourself.
Thursday, 8 December 2011
DRAFT Evaluation Question 4 - How Did You Use Media Technologies In The Construction And Research, Planning And Evaluation Stages?
In the construction of my research, planning and evaluation stages, I used many different technologies. Firstly, I used my Sony VAIO laptop:
This was easily transported in my bag and was light which was ideal as I could use it to store images, load photos from my camera, access the internet, download files, use blogger and all of the necessary software which I needed was all waiting and ready to be used. I used my laptop in the research and planning stages to research into bands and videos and then create powerpoints with analysed details on these products. I then used it throughout the evaluation stages to display my answers in interesting and engaging ways and show my ability to use many different technologies.
In order to research effectively with my laptop, I used the Google search engine
Along with YouTube
In order to retrieve all of the information I needed regarding album covers, digipacs, music videos, theories etc. But YouTube was not only used for research, we used it to display our video online and receive feedback from our peers and from our teacher when we embedded the video on blogger.
We used blogger
To display all of our products we have created, the research and planning leading up to them, inspirations, analyses and also to receive feedback from our teachers as well as finding out tasks that our teachers have set on their blogs. This is very useful as I could access blogger from anywhere with the internet and begin posting if I had an idea in my head. This made life a lot easier than hand writing all of my ideas and then combining them in a folder as I would not run the risk of forgetting any of my work as it would all be on the blog. Before creating posts, I would create images and products on software such as Photoshop or Sony Vegas:
These editing softwares enabled me to create products that are unique to me which use common conventions of other media products and entice an audience. These products varied from stop motion experimenting videos on Sony Vegas to creating a digipac on Photoshop. Photoshop made my life a lot easier to fulfil conventions of other real media products as it is hard to achieve the effects the professional products without any editing whatsoever. Before using any text on Photoshop, I would craft what I wanted to say on Microsoft word.
This would minimise spelling errors and I could organise the layout of the writing without any extra fuss on Photoshop. Once I had created these ideas, both myself and the other group members would share these products with Facebook and Twitter:
These social networking sites enabled us not only to share products with the audience and receive feedback but also for us and the band members to convey information to one another about filming dates, costumes, progress and equipment etc.
During filming processes we used two cameras which were very similar, the Sony NEX-5 and the Sony NEX-7
This provided a high quality image and great playback facilities so that we could review what we had filmed in seconds. This camera was also easily compatible with the apple mac we used for editing:
When filming, we also used the mac to play music on iTunes so that the band could sing along in time in order to make lip syncing easier for us in the editing process.
Email was another way of communicating with each other along with texting from my blackberry which could also receive emails whilst 'on-the-go' so I could keep up to date with the group's actions and what was happening.
In conclusion, the use of media technologies throughout my media course has enabled both me and my group to communicate with ease, share files with one another, work efficiently and produce work on time. Without media technologies, what we have created as a group would be impossible. Media technologies are always developing their ergonomics and how user friendly they are, which makes them easier to use and more accessible for a wide audience. Media technologies are having an ever increasing impact on the world and are helping people like us media students to create far more professional products than what we would have been able to five years ago. Nowadays, Americans have access to 1,000,000,000,000 web pages and 65,000 iPhone apps - all of this information in your pocket. The modern day phone is a million times cheaper, a thousand times more powerful and a hundred times smaller than the MIT computer in 1965. So what fits in your pocket now, will fit inside a blood cell in 25 years. This media convergence has enabled me to create these products and enabled you to view them in such a convenient way. Thank you, internet.
DRAFT Evaluation Question 3 - What Have You Learnt From Your Audience Feedback?
Before we created our video, each member of our group analysed at least three real music videos that exist on the market today. The feedback I received from them is as follows:
This feedback I received from Mr. Smith told me to look at "elements you could incorporate into your own music video" and to look at the "simple techniques" some videos use. These comments obviously adapted my approach to making a music video and I learnt that the conventions of music videos are not as easy to use in your own music video as you might think - such as lip syncing.
After analysing these videos, I went on to creating an audience profile where I looked at the sort of person who would either buy or use our media products. Here is the feedback Mr. Smith gave me regarding this:
In order to make my target audience clearer, I created a moodboard that showed the types of bands they would listen to and the dress-sense they may have. Mr. Smith said:
From this, we each, in turn, created a band logo and Mr. Smith, along with Meg said:
Therefore i deemed them sufficient and thought they required no more developments and so moved on to taking test shots for the bands real photoshoot for the front covers etc. The feedback was as follows:
This feedback was a valid point, women in the indie genre generally dress less like a woman and in more manly clothes. So this feedback influenced the way we dressed Georgia in order for her to fit the form of the genre.
We then each edited the photos from the Photoshoot so that they suited the indie genre more, I did this by adding levels on photoshop and creating a retro effect. However, Mr. Smith said:
This comment came as a shock to us, but we soon realised that what he was saying is true and so starting creating posts together and working together to achieve tasks more easily. So, we then each took a band member and outlined the clothes they will be wearing and where we drew our inspiration from for these members:
From this comment, we appointed ourselves roles in the video. Harry was the cameraman/director, Jess was the director, Meg was the sound technician and I was the lighting technician and panning cameraman. But before we jumped into our video, we experimented first with stop motion and here is the feedback I received.
We then looked into using some stop motion in our actual video and then used it in the bicycle scene and also where the band members change position on the lyrics "one night in october". After deciding on what to include in our music video, we thought that all signed artists belong to a record label and so as a group we came up with names and then decided collectively on "ZED Recordings" and then I went on to designing some logos for the whole group to use on their digipacs and posters. Here is them deciding which logo they liked the most:
After these comments, we proceeded to making the draft video.
This is a moodboard of all the feedback we received from our draft music video:
Click Image To Enlarge
As you can see from all of the feedback we received on our draft video, it was a great success with our target market. With Harry, Jess and myself all embedding the video from YouTube onto facebook and Meg cyber stalking people in order to watch it too, we received nearly 400 views in a matter of a few days and also received many likes. We did receive a few negative comments telling us that the lead singer needed to open his mouth more when he was singing, but we knew this was an issue when editing the video. We also received lots of constructive criticisms from our teachers and fellow prosumers in our class. We respected the prosumers advice more than consumers as the prosumers realise the elements and conventions needed in order to create a successful product, whereas consumers do not analyse in such a detailed manner.
After Mr. Smith had told us exactly what he believed worked and what did not, I created a post on what we had and what we had not changed from the draft to the final video. Here is the post:
On one of the pointers, Mr. Smith said "not sure party strobe scene is clear enough (could it begin with an extablishing shot of exterior showing the caravan in darkness really brightly light and ready for a party?)"
However, this is one of the few comments for improvements we decided to ignore and for a very valid reason - Jess cyber stalked Little Comets on Twitter and they gave us feedback regarding our video, as you can see on the collage of feedback I have made. They said "Bit with iPhone lighting is class!" and as they are prosumers, their feedback is very valid. They also target the same target audience that we are aiming for and so know what works for that particular genre.
After Mr. Smith had told us exactly what he believed worked and what did not, I created a post on what we had and what we had not changed from the draft to the final video. Here is the post:
Click Image To Enlarge
However, this is one of the few comments for improvements we decided to ignore and for a very valid reason - Jess cyber stalked Little Comets on Twitter and they gave us feedback regarding our video, as you can see on the collage of feedback I have made. They said "Bit with iPhone lighting is class!" and as they are prosumers, their feedback is very valid. They also target the same target audience that we are aiming for and so know what works for that particular genre.
These constructive criticisms helped us as a group to develop our music video, but maybe restricted us in some ways from doing exactly what we wanted as the scenes we would like to have used would not have used any conventions or forms of the indie genre. Here is the feedback we received on our final video before it was removed due to copyrights from YouTube, which we had to later solve by putting it on another file sharing site.
Obviously, this is disappointing in comparison with the draft, but this cannot be helped due to technical difficulties. However, this feedback still shows that our target audience is pleased with the video we have created.
My digipac went through many stages of development before I got my end product. Firstly, I experimented with fonts to see which best suited it and received feedback on facebook that is no longer available which told me that they preferred a bold font but when I looked back over it I was not certain. However, Mr. Smith commented on my font experimenting:
This gave me an incentive to draw inspiration from many different genres and artists for my digipac and so I developed it further and showed different versions of the digipac. Mr. Smith said:
After using most of these ideas and retaining feedback from other prosumers in the class, I came to my final decision with my digipac and then posted it to facebook. Here is the feedback I received:
People say they like the "retro" feel and others talk of the "depth of field" and one consumer says it belongs in the "indie" genre - which is what I was looking for. From my audience feedback I have received I have learned that the majority like the simplicity and respect the artwork I have created.
In terms of my poster, the feedback was quite positive but similar to my digipac as it uses practically the same elements. But after developing the poster endlessly, the comment I received from Mr. Smith is::
So by this satisfied comment from Mr. Smith, I decided to post the poster to facebook and here is the feedback I received:
This time I received compliments about the "simplicity" and the "retro indie feel", which was perfect as that was exactly what I was aiming for, but I did learn from one consumer that the poster could benefit from an aspect of the poster "being bolder" or making the image a bit "sharper" - however, I made the image purposefully unsharp to achieve the retro indie feel some of the other consumers have pointed out.
In conclusion to these feedbacks I have gained a lot of knowledge from audience feedback and I think it has helped me to develop my digipac, poster and video in order to make them more professional. I have learnt that sometimes what I think may look amazing some people may not appreciate and when you are creating artwork you need imagery and iconography that appeals to a wider audience than just yourself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)